Lamu Eat MP, Ms. Shakila Abdalla. LAPPSET leaders should work with local communities |
Ms. Abdalla decried the apparent disinterest by the project leadership
to address concerns of the host communities.
She cited lack of compensation of displaced families, and disengaging
the local leadership in running the project as some of indicators of this
ill-advised move by LAPPSET leadership.
“Construction of the Lamu Port is depriving the people of
their fishing livelihoods,” she said, and continued, “The project does not
provide an access route for Lamu East people to reach Lamu West.”
While acknowledging the project’s potential for developing
Northern Kenya, Mr. Omar underscored the need for the management to ensure that
the project does not stall. Failure to address the emergent issues and work
closely with the host communities jeopardizes the project’s success, he
cautioned.
Dr. Ekuro Aukot, a legal practitioner, echoed similar
sentiments. Terming the move by the project leaders as defeatist, Aukot said that
disengaging communities is against the Kenyan law. He singled out leadership
and land tenure system as the greatest challenges bedeviling the LAPPSET
project.
LAPPSET project, Dr. Aukot said, could succeed in creating
poverty amongst the people. By failing
to address land ownership, LAPPSET leadership is setting a precedent for
conflicts and endangering of the asset, he explained.
LAPPSET is among the projects touted to advance Kenya's social economic status by 2030.
The project aims at opening up the hitherto virgin Northern Kenya and linking
the country to the land locked Sudan and Ethiopia. According to Dr. Jonathan
Lodompui, Assistant Director, Vision 2030 Delivery Secretariat, LAPPSET is the
most ambitious of the 124 Vision 2030 flagship projects.
“This project offers solutions to marginalized communities,”
said Lodompui, before enlisting the components of the project to include Lamu
Port, oil refinery, petro-chemical industries, a 1700-kilometer road stretch, standard
gauge railway line, water and crude oil pipeline, and resort cities. “With its
completion, it will take three days on a road trip from Lamu to Duala,” he
offered, referring to a port town in West Africa.
Lodompui owned that it is natural for a project of the
LAPPSET magnitude to face challenges, and stir emotions, before clarifying that
the leadership is committed to solving any emergent concerns. But it was this lack of proactivity
that concerned those in attendance.
Calling upon LAPPSET management to rethink its strategy, Mr.
Omar said that dialogue and consultations with the host communities help the
team in planning. Mr. Laban Omolo, Director of Natural Resources at National
Lands Commission cautioned that sidelining the host communities could cost LAPPSET
the much-needed funding.
Speaking in the same forum, LAPPSET CEO, Mr. Sylvester
Kasuku dismissed claims that the project is detached from the host communities.
LAPPSET is designed with a human face, he said. To underline its commitment to
the community, LAPPSET has an ambitious capacity development aspect that
benefits farmers, traders and the youth where the projects snakes through,
Kasuku added.
Kasuku urged for patience, saying that plans are underway to
compensate those affected by the 200-metre wide LAPPSET corridor. According to Kasuku, the LAPPSET project team
is careful on preserving the historical appeal of Lamu islands, something that
he said is informing the development of an organized system for people to access
the islands. He reiterated that LAPPSET’s development potential goes beyond the
project’s corridor.
“Upon its completion, LAPPSET will have a 3% impact on the
GDP,” he explained, pointing to a PowerPoint screen indicating that the Lamu
Port alone is projected to handle 1780,000 containers annually. Asked whether the LAPPSET
project could be a white elephant, cliché for a costly and useless project, Kasuku
said lightly that Kenya is not home to that breed of elephants.
Unconvinced that enough ground work is in place to enable LAPPSET progress smoothly, Omar urged the secretariat to identify with the peculiar needs of the various places in the project's corridor. While the people of Lamu would be comfortable with relocation, pastoralists have different needs altogether, he added.
“I would rather you address the emerging issues now than when
a bulldozer and a camel are in front of each other.”
No comments:
Post a Comment